Friday, April 18, 2025

🚨ICE Just Boarded a Train in Montana — And Everyone Should Be Paying Attention🚨

Something alarming just happened in Montana, and it hasn’t gotten the national spotlight it deserves.

On Sunday, April 13th, armed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents boarded an Amtrak train in Havre, Montana. Dressed in full tactical gear and accompanied by dogs, they walked through the passenger cars and began asking people a simple—but chilling—question:

“Are you a U.S. citizen?”

One of the passengers, a North Dakota judge, described the encounter as “intimidating.” And it’s not hard to see why. Imagine you’re just trying to get home, or see your family, or travel for work—suddenly you're being interrogated by armed federal agents on a train inside the United States.


📍 Wait, Can They Do That?

Technically, yes—thanks to a federal rule that allows CBP to operate within 100 miles of any U.S. border. That “border zone” includes not just rural outposts like Havre, Montana, but also cities like Detroit, Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles.

In these zones, CBP agents have the legal authority to board “vessels, railcars, aircraft, or vehicles” to search for undocumented individuals without a warrant.

But just because it’s legal doesn’t mean it’s right.


🧠 Why This Matters — and Why It's a Problem

When federal agents start conducting random citizenship checks on domestic trains without probable cause, we’re not just talking about immigration anymore. We’re talking about:

  • Erosion of civil liberties

  • Normalization of authoritarian tactics

  • Racial profiling and intimidation in public spaces

  • Fear and mistrust in everyday environments like public transit

This is the kind of enforcement behavior we often associate with surveillance states—not with a free and open democracy.


🧭 We’ve Seen This Coming

For years, civil liberties organizations have been warning us about the quiet expansion of border enforcement powers. But many people shrugged it off, assuming it would only affect others—non-citizens, undocumented folks, “somewhere else.”

But now? It’s happening on domestic trains. In the interior. In towns like Havre. In communities where people thought they were safe from this kind of thing.

This isn’t just about immigration anymore. This is about all of us.


✊ What You Can Do

  1. Know Your Rights
    If you're ever questioned by ICE or CBP, remember: you don’t have to answer questions about your citizenship. You don’t have to show ID unless you're the driver of a vehicle. You can ask if you’re free to go.

  2. Spread the Word
    Don’t let this story disappear. Share it. Talk about it. Post it. Tag your representatives. Use your voice to keep this from becoming the norm.

  3. Support Legal Aid and Immigrant Advocacy Orgs
    Groups like the ACLU, RAICES, and your local immigrant support coalitions are doing the frontline work to push back.


🛑 Final Thought

This may seem like a small town event, a minor blip on the radar—but it’s not. This is a canary in the coal mine, and we need to treat it like one.

When people are being stopped and interrogated by the government inside their own country—on trains, buses, and streets—we’re already down a dangerous path. The only way to turn back is to raise hell, raise awareness, and refuse to normalize it.

Don’t let authoritarian creep slide in quietly.

Stay awake. Stay loud. Stay free.


Want to repost this? Please do. Link back if you can. Let's keep each other informed.
đź’Ą #Resist #BorderZone #ICEWatch #Amtrak #CivilLiberties #KnowYourRights #AbolishICE

Monday, April 14, 2025

They’re Building the Camps Now

The Unfolding Infrastructure of Control in the United States

While Americans argue over elections, influencers, and headlines, something far more dangerous is taking shape just out of sight. Across the country — quietly, deliberately — new detention centers are being built. Old ones are reopening. Facilities with no current occupants are being fully staffed and prepared.

They’re not waiting for a surge. They’re preparing for one.


Quiet Constructions with Loud Implications

In Alabama, a new ICE facility has opened in Limestone County, operated by the private prison corporation CoreCivic. In Pennsylvania, the once-closed Moshannon Valley Correctional Center has been reopened by GEO Group for immigration detention. Down in Texas, Laredo’s detention infrastructure has been expanded, and the infamous South Texas Family Residential Center — long a symbol of family separation — is back in full operation.

Guantánamo Bay, perhaps the most symbolic prison in American memory, has seen more than 140 large tents erected in just over two weeks — capable of housing tens of thousands. Officials say these are for migrants. But no one is being transparent about why that number, or why that location.

And these are just the public ones.


Why Are We Building This?

Private prison companies like CoreCivic and GEO Group are reporting rising revenues and securing new federal contracts. They are building and expanding facilities even before a "need" arises.

This isn’t just about detaining undocumented immigrants anymore. These facilities can be used for anyone deemed a threat to “order” — protestors, journalists, dissidents, or everyday citizens caught on the wrong side of a policy shift.

When a government builds cages, it’s not because they plan on keeping them empty.


History Is Whispering

This pattern is not new.

Before Nazi Germany began arresting en masse, they built the camps. The trains, the lists, the legal justifications — all came after the infrastructure was in place. Ordinary Germans claimed they didn’t know. Many said it couldn’t be happening — until the day the war ended and they were forced to walk past what they’d smelled but denied.

Infrastructure always comes first. Then laws are rewritten. Then it's too late.


This Is the Moment to Pay Attention

This isn’t alarmism — it’s logistics. And logistics don’t lie.

  • The government is actively preparing facilities that can house tens of thousands.

  • Private companies are pouring millions into empty buildings.

  • There is no clear accountability for how or why these facilities are being expanded.

  • The American public, as always, is distracted by the next trending topic.

If history teaches us anything, it’s that the future doesn’t arrive all at once — it creeps in under the guise of "readiness."


What You Can Do

  • Ask local representatives: are any contracts with ICE, CoreCivic, or GEO Group active in your area?

  • Refuse silence. Talk about this publicly. Name what’s happening.

  • Support organizations resisting detention and mass incarceration.

  • Share this with someone who thinks “it could never happen here.”


Final Word

They are building the camps now.

That’s not a metaphor.

That’s not hyperbole.

That’s an observable, documentable fact.

And if we don’t speak now — before they’re filled — history will remember our silence just as it remembers the silence of others before us.

Friday, April 11, 2025

From Majestic to Market: The Corporate Afterlife of MJ-12

🕳️ INTRO: THE MYTH THAT WON’T DIE

In 1984, an envelope containing a roll of undeveloped film landed in a writer’s mailbox. The developed images revealed a document allegedly classified “TOP SECRET/MAJIC,” listing 12 names—scientists, military men, intelligence heads. Thus began the modern lore of Majestic 12, the rumored shadow committee tasked by President Truman with investigating extraterrestrial life.

Whether real or deliberate disinfo, the MJ-12 documents posed a compelling question:

Who would be trusted to handle a secret bigger than nukes?

The answer in 1947 might have been generals and White House advisors.

But today?

Follow the money.

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Emma Goldman Story: The Mother of Anarchism



When I was fifteen, I found a torn copy of Living My Life wedged behind a row of used books at a dusty thrift store. It wasn’t a planned discovery. It was more like fate—or maybe it was Emma, reaching out from history with her ink-stained fingers to slap me awake.

I grew up in a world that prized obedience, politeness, and the illusion of safety over truth. I was taught to be small, quiet, agreeable. But something in me always burned. I just didn’t have the words for it yet. Not until I met Emma Goldman.

Reading her was like learning a new language—the language of defiance. Suddenly, the knot of frustration I carried every day had a name. Injustice. Patriarchy. State violence. Capitalist greed. She didn’t just name the monsters; she showed me they could be fought. That you could laugh and love and live while swinging fists at the system.

It wasn't just her politics that moved me. It was her humanness. Her contradictions. Her tenderness. The way she fought tirelessly, even when she was exhausted, exiled, or alone. She wasn’t trying to be perfect—she was trying to be free.

And that became the call in my own bones: freedom, not just for me, but for everyone.

Emma taught me that being radical wasn’t about shouting the loudest or being the most correct. It was about integrity. About risk. About love. She made space in my mind for a future I could actually believe in—one where art, mutual aid, and collective care weren’t luxuries, but fundamentals.

When I read about how she would walk for miles in worn-out shoes to speak to factory workers, or how she risked everything to smuggle information and organize women, I realized something: revolution doesn’t start with guns or manifestos. It starts in the guts of the people who refuse to accept the world as it is.

Years later, I would go on to build a life outside the system, shaped by those same fires she lit in me. I’d leave behind jobs that drained me, walk away from respectability, pour myself into art and resistance, create something real from the wreckage. Emma walked beside me the whole way, her ghost whispering reminders: joy is not a distraction; it is the point.

This isn’t just a tribute to her. It’s a thank-you letter. Emma Goldman gave me a mirror that reflected something other than compliance. She showed me that I wasn’t broken or crazy; I was alive.

And now, when I write, when I protest, when I dance barefoot in defiance of despair, I carry her with me.

The revolution is long, but it’s made of people like her. People like us.

Still dancing. Still dangerous- Let's look deeper.


Revolutionary, Feminist, Anarchist Icon

Emma Goldman (1869–1940) was one of the most influential political thinkers and activists of the early 20th century, though her name is often left out of mainstream history books. Born in present-day Lithuania, Goldman immigrated to the United States at 16 and quickly became a towering voice in anarchist, feminist, and anti-capitalist circles.

Goldman's beliefs were radical then—and still radical now. She challenged the institution of marriage, advocated for women's access to birth control, and stood fiercely against capitalism, war, and authoritarianism in all forms. Her speeches drew massive crowds, and her writings electrified working-class movements around the world.

She co-founded the anarchist journal Mother Earth and was imprisoned multiple times for her activism—including for speaking about contraception and opposing U.S. involvement in World War I. In 1919, she was deported during the first Red Scare alongside other radicals, ending her time in the U.S. but not her fight.

Emma’s legacy continues to inspire those who refuse to compromise their beliefs in exchange for comfort. In an age where activism is often sanitized, branded, or co-opted by capitalism, Goldman’s raw, uncompromising fire feels more vital than ever. She believed that political struggle must be intertwined with passion and joy—a message that resonates deeply in our era of burnout and cynicism.

Why does she matter now? Because she reminds us that resistance can be beautiful. That we don’t have to be polite to be powerful. And that freedom isn’t something granted—it’s something taken, created, and lived.

So as we face ongoing struggles for bodily autonomy, workers’ rights, racial justice, and queer liberation, Emma’s spirit remains a guiding force.

Emma Goldman didn’t believe in waiting for permission. She believed in action—raw, brave, sometimes dangerous action. To her, words were important, but only if they moved people to do something. She didn’t want to be a symbol. She wanted to shake the system.

And she did.

Throughout her life, Emma Goldman was involved in acts of direct action that challenged the power structures of her time: the state, the church, the prison system, the patriarchy, and the capitalist machine. She knew the risks, and she never flinched. These were not stunts. They were strategies. And they lit fires that still burn.

1. The Attempted Assassination of Henry Clay Frick (1892)

Goldman’s early political life was marked by solidarity with the working class, particularly during the violent labor struggles of the late 1800s. After the Homestead Strike, where Carnegie Steel’s hired goons opened fire on striking workers, Goldman and her partner Alexander Berkman hatched a plan to assassinate Henry Clay Frick, the plant manager responsible for the brutality.

Berkman carried out the attempt and was imprisoned for 14 years. While Goldman didn’t physically pull the trigger, she helped plan and defend the act, viewing it as “propaganda of the deed”—a dramatic act meant to expose the violence of capitalism and inspire resistance. It was a controversial stance even among radicals, but for Goldman, it was about justice for the working class when the courts and cops failed them.

2. Advocating for Birth Control (1910s)

At a time when simply talking about contraception was illegal in the United States, Goldman toured the country giving speeches on birth control and distributing information to working-class women. She was arrested multiple times for this, but she refused to stop. She saw access to contraception as a cornerstone of women’s freedom—an act of resistance against both religious morality and patriarchal control.

She didn’t just talk theory—she brought pamphlets, gave practical advice, and risked jail to ensure that women could make choices about their own bodies.

3. Anti-Draft Resistance During WWI

When the U.S. entered World War I, Emma Goldman stood firm against it, calling it a capitalist war fought on the backs of the poor. She and Berkman organized the No Conscription League, encouraging young men to resist the draft. They held rallies, printed flyers, and openly defied the law.

The government responded by arresting both Goldman and Berkman under the newly minted Espionage Act. They served two years in prison before being deported in 1919. Goldman never regretted it. For her, resisting war wasn’t unpatriotic—it was the highest form of loyalty to humanity.

4. Organizing Labor and Anarchist Movements

Goldman spent decades giving fiery speeches across the U.S., often to packed halls and in the face of hecklers, cops, and hired thugs. She supported unionization efforts, especially among garment workers, and helped organize strikes. But unlike some leftist leaders of her time, she didn’t believe in power for its own sake—her goal was to awaken consciousness, to ignite people’s sense of dignity and possibility.

She also co-founded Mother Earth, an anarchist magazine that ran from 1906 to 1917, publishing works that challenged authoritarianism, capitalism, and state violence. The magazine itself was a form of direct action—spreading ideas that could mobilize hearts and minds.


Why Direct Action Matters Now

Emma Goldman’s life is a masterclass in political courage. She didn’t wait for perfect conditions. She didn’t tone herself down to be more palatable. She acted.

In today’s world, where protest is often reduced to hashtags or diluted by politics-as-branding, Goldman reminds us that real change often comes from acts that are inconvenient, risky, and real. Whether it’s organizing mutual aid, confronting police brutality, defending bodily autonomy, or creating alternatives to oppressive systems, the spirit of direct action is still alive—and necessary.

Goldman wasn’t trying to be safe. She was trying to be free. And she wanted us to be free too.

So when we honor her memory, let it not just be in words.

Let it be in what we do.

Monday, March 31, 2025

Isekai and the Rise of Incel Culture: A Deep Dive into Power Fantasies, Male Escapism, and the Death of Good Storytelling



Introduction: Welcome to Your Fantasy, Loser

Once upon a time, isekai was about adventure, discovery, and transformation. Stories like The Vision of Escaflowne, Fushigi Yuugi, and even Digimon transported ordinary characters to extraordinary worlds where they faced real conflict, growth, and struggle. But somewhere along the way, isekai stopped being about earning power and became about being granted power—instantly, effortlessly, and overwhelmingly.

Now, the landscape is polluted with dead-eyed, black-haired protagonists who get hit by a truck, wake up in a magical land, and immediately become the strongest beings in existence while gathering a harem of devoted waifus. This shift is no accident—it directly reflects the rise of online incel culture, disaffected masculinity, and escapist wish-fulfillment.

So let's dissect how isekai became the wet dream of the socially disenfranchised, why these stories feed into a toxic worldview, and how anime needs to reclaim the genre before it drowns in its own mediocrity.

The Fall of Isekai: From Classic Adventures to Cheat-Code Power Fantasies

Isekai wasn’t always this bad. The earliest examples—like Alice in Wonderland or The Wizard of Oz—were about characters navigating strange, surreal landscapes and learning from their journeys. Even in anime, older isekai followed the same hero’s journey arc:

  1. Ordinary protagonist enters an unfamiliar world

  2. They struggle, adapt, and change

  3. They grow through effort, hardship, and sacrifice

  4. Their choices have consequences

  5. They earn their power and return changed

Fast forward to today, and most modern isekai looks like this:

  1. Loser dies (probably via Truck-kun)

  2. They wake up in a medieval fantasy world that operates on JRPG mechanics

  3. They’re instantly overpowered because of some “cheat ability”

  4. Every female character falls in love with them for no reason

  5. They form a harem while effortlessly solving world-ending crises

  6. They remain emotionally stunted, because character growth is for peasants

These stories strip away all stakes, struggle, and consequence. Why work for power when it can just be handed to you? Why develop relationships when women will worship you no matter what? This shift is where we see the insidious overlap between modern isekai and incel culture.


Isekai and the Incel Connection: The Psychology of a Power Fantasy

Let’s be blunt: Modern isekai feeds on male loneliness and disempowerment.

Think about the average protagonist in these stories:

  • Socially isolated

  • Lack of real-world achievements

  • Feels misunderstood or unappreciated

  • Thinks society is unfairly stacked against them

Now think about the incel worldview:

  • Believes women ignore them despite their “hidden greatness”

  • Blames society for their lack of success

  • Obsessed with power and dominance

  • Craves a world where they are special, without having to change

These stories essentially validate the incel mindset. They tell these men: “Yes, you’re secretly special. Yes, the world is unfair. No, you don’t need to change—just wait for destiny to recognize your greatness.”

Instead of challenging these disaffected young men to grow, modern isekai coddles them. It hands them a world where:

  • They are effortlessly superior

  • Every woman adores them

  • Every enemy is inferior

  • Their antisocial tendencies are never questioned

This is why the genre exploded in popularity among disenfranchised young men. It doesn’t challenge them—it validates their fantasies.


Good vs. Bad Isekai: When Power Comes With a Price

Not all isekai is bad. Some series still respect the genre’s potential by forcing characters to struggle, grow, and make real sacrifices. Let’s compare:

GOOD ISEKAI:

🔥 Mushoku Tensei – Character growth, real emotional weight, consequences for actions. 🔥 Re:Zero – Protagonist suffers, fails, and has to actually EARN his development. 🔥 Made in Abyss – Brutal, unforgiving world. No shortcuts, no safety nets.

BAD ISEKAI:

💩 That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime – Zero struggle, infinite power, everyone loves MC. 💩 Arifureta – Edgelord wish-fulfillment with no real stakes. 💩 Death March to the Parallel World Rhapsody – MC is a god, women throw themselves at him, nothing matters.

The difference? The good ones make power a burden, not a gift. The bad ones hand the MC the world on a silver platter.


Conclusion: Isekai Needs to Evolve—Or Die

The isekai genre is at a crossroads. It can continue catering to insecure men who want effortless dominance, or it can reclaim its narrative strength by making protagonists earn their success.

Great storytelling isn’t about granting power—it’s about testing it. If modern isekai refuses to challenge its characters, it will continue to rot into the same hollow, repetitive trash we see flooding every anime season.

It’s time for isekai to grow up. Otherwise, the only thing getting reincarnated is the same tired, uninspired self-insert fantasy we’ve seen a thousand times before.


Final Question: What’s the worst isekai you’ve ever seen? Let’s drag it in the comments.

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Putin: A Legacy of Fear, Manipulation, and War



Vladimir Putin has long been portrayed as a shadowy figure in global politics, a man of mystery who rose from obscurity to become one of the most dominant leaders of the 21st century. But his ascent to power is not a story of luck or simple political ambition. It is a carefully crafted path paved with intelligence operations, manufactured crises, and ruthless eliminations of opposition. By examining key events in his life and rule, we can trace a clear pattern of how Putin consolidates power, manipulates crises, and expands Russia’s influence through force and control.

Early Years: The KGB and the Fall of the Soviet Union (1952–1998)

Born in 1952 in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), Putin entered the KGB in 1975, where he specialized in counterintelligence and foreign espionage. He spent much of the 1980s stationed in East Germany, witnessing firsthand the decline of Soviet influence in Eastern Europe. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Putin returned to Russia and aligned himself with Anatoly Sobchak, the mayor of St. Petersburg, as a key aide. During this period, there were numerous allegations of corruption and backdoor dealings that enriched Putin and his close allies. In 1996, he moved to Moscow and quickly rose through the ranks of Boris Yeltsin’s government, eventually becoming head of the FSB, Russia’s main security agency, in 1998.

1999 Apartment Bombings: The Catalyst for Putin’s Rise

In September 1999, a series of devastating apartment bombings rocked Moscow and other Russian cities, killing nearly 300 people. The attacks were immediately blamed on Chechen terrorists, leading to mass panic and public outcry for strong leadership. Putin, then serving as Prime Minister, capitalized on the moment by launching a brutal military campaign in Chechnya. His approval ratings soared, transforming him from an obscure bureaucrat into Russia’s new strongman.

However, serious doubts remain about who was actually behind the bombings. The most damning piece of evidence came when FSB agents were caught planting explosives in an apartment building in Ryazan, only to later claim it was a “training exercise.” Critics, including former FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko (who was later assassinated in London via radioactive poisoning), alleged that the bombings were a false flag operation carried out by Russian intelligence to justify war and catapult Putin to power. Regardless of the truth, the bombings set the stage for Putin’s takeover.

On December 31, 1999, Boris Yeltsin unexpectedly resigned, handing the presidency to Putin. In March 2000, he officially won the election, cementing his control.

The Chechen War and the Expansion of Power (2000–2004)

Once in office, Putin wasted no time consolidating power. He moved quickly to bring independent media under state control, particularly targeting TV networks that had criticized the government. His brutal campaign in Chechnya escalated, with Russian forces accused of widespread human rights abuses. In 2002, the Moscow theater hostage crisis ended in disaster when Russian special forces used toxic gas, killing 130 hostages alongside the terrorists. Putin’s government deflected blame and used the crisis to justify further crackdowns on civil liberties.

In 2003, he targeted powerful oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, head of Yukos Oil, who had been critical of the Kremlin. Khodorkovsky was arrested, his assets seized, and Yukos dismantled. This was a clear message: no one, no matter how wealthy or powerful, could challenge Putin and survive.

Beslan Massacre and the Move Toward Authoritarianism (2004)

In 2004, the Beslan school hostage crisis shocked the world. Over 1,100 people, mostly children, were taken hostage by Chechen militants. The Russian military’s response was disastrous—tanks, flamethrowers, and heavy weapons were used, resulting in the deaths of 334 people, including 186 children. Putin used the tragedy to justify sweeping security changes, including ending direct elections for regional governors, further consolidating Kremlin control.

Expansionism and the Return to Soviet-Style Rule (2005–2014)

By the mid-2000s, Putin had neutralized nearly all opposition and was shifting focus outward. In 2008, he launched a military invasion of Georgia, seizing control of the regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The West’s response was weak, emboldening Putin for future moves.

After briefly stepping down to let Dmitry Medvedev serve as a placeholder president from 2008 to 2012, Putin returned to power in a rigged election, facing widespread protests. These protests were crushed with mass arrests and new draconian laws limiting free speech.

Then, in 2014, he orchestrated the annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, the most aggressive territorial expansion in Europe since World War II. His forces backed separatists in eastern Ukraine, sparking a war that continues to this day. Though Western nations imposed sanctions, Putin solidified his nationalist image within Russia, framing the conflict as a stand against Western aggression.

The Dictator Model and the Ukraine Invasion (2015–Present)

In 2015, Putin intervened in Syria, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s regime and expanding Russian military influence in the Middle East. At home, he increased crackdowns on dissent, poisoning or imprisoning critics like opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

By 2020, he changed the Russian constitution, allowing himself to stay in power until at least 2036. Two years later, in 2022, he launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, expecting a swift victory. Instead, the war turned into a quagmire, isolating Russia economically and diplomatically. Despite heavy losses, Putin doubled down, suppressing internal dissent and tightening his grip further.

The Pattern: How Putin Operates

A clear pattern emerges from Putin’s actions:

  • Manipulates or manufactures crises to seize power (1999 apartment bombings, Beslan, Ukraine war).

  • Silences or eliminates opposition through poisonings, imprisonments, and assassinations.

  • Expands Russian influence through military force (Chechnya, Georgia, Ukraine, Syria).

  • Controls media and elections to maintain absolute power.

For over two decades, Putin has ruled not as a traditional political leader but as a man who thrives on fear, war, and authoritarian control. Understanding this history is crucial to predicting what he might do next. The world has witnessed his methods, yet time and again, he has been underestimated. As long as he remains in power, his strategy will not change—only the targets will.

Friday, March 28, 2025

Hayao Miyazaki: The Hypocritical Gatekeeper of Animation


Hayao Miyazaki is often revered as one of the greatest animators of all time, an uncompromising visionary who champions traditional hand-drawn animation and artistic purity. But beneath the surface of his carefully curated image as a master artist lies a deep hypocrisy—one that exposes him as a shill for nostalgia and an inconsistent critic of the very industry that made him famous.

The Man Who Hates His Own Industry

Miyazaki has made it clear in countless interviews that he has a deep disdain for modern animation, often bemoaning the current state of the industry and claiming that "anime was a mistake." He’s criticized young animators for lacking life experience, dismissed CGI as soulless, and painted himself as the last bastion of true artistry. Yet, despite his never-ending complaints, he remains one of the biggest benefactors of the very system he condemns. His films are financed by major corporations, his merchandise floods stores worldwide, and his works are propped up by the same industry he constantly tears down.

If anime was a mistake, Miyazaki had every opportunity to walk away from it decades ago. Instead, he stayed, profited, and continued to push his own brand while slamming everything around him. He thrives in a system he claims to despise, yet never steps aside to let new creators take the stage.

The CGI Hypocrisy

Miyazaki’s hatred for CGI is well-documented. He has infamously dismissed it as inferior and lacking human touch. However, that hasn’t stopped him from using CGI in his own films when it suits him. The Wind Rises (2013) and The Boy and the Heron (2023) both utilize CGI, yet Miyazaki remains quick to mock others who rely on it. It’s easy to call modern techniques soulless when you have an entire studio of underpaid artists meticulously crafting your vision for you.

Furthermore, his Studio Ghibli co-founder, Toshio Suzuki, has admitted that Miyazaki understands the necessity of CGI and uses it when it benefits his work. This means his public disdain for the medium isn’t based on principle—it’s a carefully maintained persona to keep him in the good graces of those who romanticize his approach to animation.

The AI Art Controversy

Miyazaki has also gone on record saying AI-generated art is an insult to life itself, calling it "disgusting" and claiming it lacks humanity. But let’s be real—Miyazaki’s career was built on the shoulders of countless animators who drew the frames he envisioned. His personal style of animation, while brilliant, is still a product of many artists working together under his strict direction.

The argument that AI removes the human struggle from art could just as easily be applied to any technological advancement in animation. At one point, people resisted digital animation tools, yet today they are industry standards. The same could be said about AI. If anything, Miyazaki’s refusal to engage with new technology only reinforces his status as a gatekeeper—one who refuses to evolve while simultaneously ensuring his legacy remains untouchable.

The Capitalist Anti-Capitalist

Miyazaki presents himself as a critic of corporate greed, yet Studio Ghibli operates like any other major animation studio, profiting from an endless stream of merchandise, theme park attractions, and international licensing deals. The Ghibli aesthetic—once considered an artistic statement—has been commodified to an extreme degree.

Miyazaki claims to hate mass consumerism, but he has no problem allowing Ghibli-branded products to be sold at premium prices. If he truly believed in preserving the integrity of art over profit, he could have kept his works away from the merchandising machine entirely. Instead, he allowed it to flourish while maintaining the illusion of an independent, anti-commercial spirit.

Conclusion: The Miyazaki Illusion

Hayao Miyazaki is undeniably a genius, but he is also a hypocrite. He scorns the modern anime industry while profiting from it, dismisses CGI while using it, and condemns capitalism while benefiting from its fruits. His status as a revered master has allowed him to escape real scrutiny, but the truth is clear: Miyazaki’s biggest strength isn’t just his artistry—it’s his ability to cultivate a myth around himself while doing the very things he claims to hate.

At the end of the day, Miyazaki isn’t the last great artist standing against a corrupt industry—he’s simply the most successful at playing both sides.

🚨ICE Just Boarded a Train in Montana — And Everyone Should Be Paying Attention🚨

Something alarming just happened in Montana, and it hasn’t gotten the national spotlight it deserves. On Sunday, April 13th, armed U.S. Cus...